Category Archives: Uncategorized

Faith Seeking Understanding

He has made everything beautiful in its time. Also, he has put eternity into man’s heart, yet so that he cannot find out what God has done from the beginning to the end.

Ecclesiastes 3:11 (ESV)

There is a famous Christian maxim from St Anselm. His famous motto goes: “faith seeking understanding.”  What exactly did St. Anselm mean? Does he mean that faith initially begins with a lack of understanding, void of rational support? Does he mean that faith is uncertainty?

There are those, unfortunately, within the Christian tradition, whether Christian existentialism a la Soren Kierkegaard or Fideism a la many modern evangelicals, who do believe that faith, is a “blind leap into the dark” of irrational abandon.  There are also those of a secular, humanistic proclivity who contend that faith is unsupportable. Case in point is one modern secular, humanist. Siegfried Gold writes:

Moving on to the charge of “the glorification of absolute certainty”: Faith is not certainty. Belief in the omnipotence of a being who is invisible, intangible, and undetectable–especially in the face of scientific theories that remove the need for God in explaining the origins of the universe or intelligent creatures–requires a lot of faith. If the language expressing that faith sometimes seems over the top, full of hyperbole, expressive of an impossible certainty, let us have some sympathy for what believers are trying to overcome with such language. People don’t believe because they are certain; they use professions of certainty as a support for a nearly unsupportable belief–and, again, they do so because it is worth it to them….The question for thoughtful atheists is not how believers manage to sustain their belief, but why they choose to do so: what do they get out of it? They are not primitive people needing myths and fairy tales to explain a frightening universe. They gain a source of hope, purpose, camaraderie, and moral guidance that some atheists find enviable.[1]

Note that he says “faith is not certainty.” Why does he hold this? It’s because, as he says, “People don’t believe because they are certain; they [have] certainty as a support for… [a lack of] belief.” His reasoning goes: the greater one’s certainty… the greater is one’s incredulity. He seems to be saying that the Christian faith and all Christians’ faith are sort of delusionally optimistic. The delusion is not based upon, as Freud was fond of saying, the impersonal forces of nature explained and animated and personalized through myths and fables. He is honest and more gracious than some militant atheists on this matter. It is not a matter of inferior intellect, but the delusion is based upon “hope, purpose, camaraderie, and moral guidance that some atheists find enviable.” I would guess what Mr. Gold means by his comment about some atheists envying the Christian sentiment of hope, purpose, etc. is something akin to an adult who envies the innocence of a child’s hope that springs eternal, a hope which inevitably gives way to the angst of brooding adolescence.

What are we to make of all of this? Well, there is a myriad of points I could take to task, but let me simply explain what St. Anselm meant by “Faith seeking understanding.” Anselm, like Augustine, held to a biblical/theological notion of faith. Biblically speaking, faith (as in the exercise of one’s faith as a faculty of the soul or mind), is first and foremost an intellectual assent of the mind where the mind agrees with the facts of reality. For example, an elevator will take me to the 50th floor of a skyscraper. I am acknowledging that the elevator will take me to the 50th floor. This is my intellectual assent. Philosophers call this the correspondence theory of truth. However, there is a second component to faith, and that is the emotional consent of the will. This is when one’s heart trusts and then acts in light of such trusting. For example, if I agree to get into the elevator and have it take me to the 50th floor then I am trusting that the elevator will take me to the 50th floor, evinced by my stepping into the elevator and allowing it to take me to the 50th floor. This is what Anselm meant by faith. When faith is habitually exercised a deeper understanding, a deeper trust, a deeper confidence supervenes. For example, the more frequently I take the elevator to the 50th floor my understanding deepens, my trust deepens, and my confidence deepens in the ability of the elevator to function. Faith seeking understanding is simply the moral dynamics of faith increasing in certainty.

The author of Hebrews says that “Faith is the substance of things hoped for the evidence of things unseen.” In other words, biblical faith is based upon reality: that is, substantial reality, or evidential certainty! The reality that is hoped for and the certainty evinced is God’s promise of His Son. All the promises of God are yea and amen in Christ. God has placed “eternity” in each and every person’s heart, a heart in need of Jesus Christ the eternal Word made flesh. Christ is the embodiment of eternal hope, eternal purpose, eternal fellowship, and eternal moral guidance envied by all. The death, burial, and resurrection of Christ—that is the gospel concerning Jesus Christ is the only certainty in life. And the more we trust in Christ the more our faith increases in certainty; in Christ faith is always seeking understanding or as St. Paul notes in his letter to the Romans: “The just shall live from faith to faith.” It is a life of ever increasing faith.  Faith seeking understanding does not require a lot of faith, but it does requires an ever increasing faith.

Soli Deo Gloria

G Carl Moore

Leave a comment

Filed under Uncategorized

Satisfaction Theory of Atonement by R. C. Sproul!

Leave a comment

August 26, 2013 · 5:27 pm

http://termineigh.com/album pages/2013/13-07_new_jersey/intro.html

Leave a comment

August 21, 2013 · 11:23 am

Real Christians

5 I am the vine; you are the branches. Whoever abides in me and I in him, he it is that bears much fruit, for apart from me you can do nothing. 6 If anyone does not abide in me he is thrown away like a branch and withers; and the branches are gathered, thrown into the fire, and burned. 7 If you abide in me, and my words abide in you, ask whatever you wish, and it will be done for you. 8 By this my Father is glorified, that you bear much fruit and so prove to be my disciples. 9 As the Father has loved me, so have I loved you. Abide in my love. 10 If you keep my commandments, you will abide in my love, just as I have kept my Father’s commandments and abide in his love.  (Joh 15:-10 ESV)

In an article in the Washington Post[1] entitled “ When Christianity Becomes Lethal,”  Susan Brooks Thistlethwaite, professor of Theology at Chicago Theological Seminary, contends that the Christian faith has elements within it which are conducive to abuse and misuse, hence lending itself to potential violence or at least suggestive of violence. This is in light of the recent bombing that took place in Norway, perpetrated by Anders Behring Breivik. She goes on and writes:

“It is absolutely critical that Christians not turn away from the Christian theological elements in such religiously inspired terrorism. We must acknowledge these elements in Christianity and forthrightly reject these extremist interpretations of our religion. How can we ask Muslims to do the same with Islam, if we won’t confront extremists distorting Christianity?”

She also quotes Stephen Prothero who says:

“When I was a professor at Georgia State University in Atlanta, I required my students to read Nazi theology. I wanted them to understand how some Christians bent the words of the Bible into weapons aimed at Jews and how these weapons found their mark at Auschwitz and Dachau. My Christian students responded to these disturbing readings with one disturbing voice: the Nazis were not real Christians, they informed me, since real Christians would never kill Jews in crematories.”

Prof. Thistlethwaite agrees with Prothero when he confesses that he found their response “terrifying.” Question!!—why would these Professors find such a response “terrifying” from their students? What is so terrifying to assert that the Nazis were not “real Christians,” because real Christians would not employ the beastly and wicked act of genocide? The only thing that makes sense out of their odd sentiment is that either both Thistlethwaite and Prothero do not believe that the Nazis were (and other ideologues who justify violence in the name of the Christian faith are) bending the words of Scripture—meaning that there are elements true to the Christian faith that can, at the same time, also truly justify violence without much bending, on the one hand— or, on the other hand, they either do not understand what “bend[ing] the words of the Bible into weapons aimed at Jew” really means. In regards to the latter, by definition bending or abusing or misusing anyone, or something is not an indictment upon the object that has been bent or abused or misused (in this case the Bible), but a condemnation of the abuser (in our case the Norway Bomber). St. Augustine once opined, “Do not judge a world-view based upon its abuse or misuse.” Ravi Zacharias then added that, “…instead one must judge a world-view upon the teaching and example of its founder.” The author of this article does not seem to notice that this “right-wing” Christian ideologue (not theologian) is not following the words or actions of Jesus. So by definition he cannot be “Christian,” if one means by Christian a true disciple of Jesus who “abides” and follows the “way of Christ.” I am sure the day before he murdered those 76 victims by virtue of his madness, he did not ask, “WHAT WOULD JESUS DO?” The same goes for the Nazis!

It is a ridiculous assertion and question to ask (as Prof. Thistlethwaite does) that:

“We must acknowledge these elements in Christianity and forthrightly reject these extremist interpretations of our religion. How can we ask Muslims to do the same with Islam, if we won’t confront extremists distorting Christianity?”

I say it’s ridiculous because (again) a misuse of Christianity to justify violence is not and cannot besmirch the Christian faith, because our founder (Jesus) never justified violence. In fact Jesus prepared “real Christians” to expect that violence will be done to us if we hold to the faith…because violence was done to Him, Jesus. Jesus asks rhetorically “is a slave greater than his or her master?” If Jesus being our master endured violence then why should we expect any less?

Christianity is the only religion that cannot (and ought not) move beyond its founder. Simply put Jesus was perfect in all ways, including His humanity. The saying, “To err is human” though applying to everyone (including every religious founder of every religion from the past to present and future) never applied to Jesus. When we move beyond Jesus (the cornerstone of our faith) we are the ones who err. When we err we stray into violence and justify it in untold ways, including religious ways, e.g., the Crusades, the 17th century Wars of Religion,…etc. Even Jesus Himself said that if we are to be “real Christians” we must not move beyond Him, but toward him. Jesus says it this way in John 15: “ 5 I am the vine; you are the branches. Whoever abides in me and I in him, he it is that bears much fruit, for apart from me you can do nothing.”

In conclusion, may we keep our eyes and hearts and minds fixed upon Jesus alone.  May we not move beyond, but toward Jesus by abiding in him. We abide in Jesus by obeying God’s Word. The greatest commandment is to love God and only then can we love our neighbor. Jesus tells us that the only way we can know that we are saved (making him both Lord and Savior) is by our fruit. Fruit (good works) does not save, but it’s evidence of our salvation. “Real Christians” do in fact bear good fruit! It’s the opposite that is so “terrifying”.

Solo Deo Gloria

Rev G Carl Moore

Leave a comment

August 17, 2013 · 5:03 pm

“But now the ri…

“But now the righteousness of God has been revealed apart from the law….”
Romans 3: 31

Leave a comment

August 17, 2013 · 4:32 pm